Subject	ya know .. i was gonna say something about that.
Posted by	Guapo on February 26, 2003 at 4:09 PM
	This message has been viewed 34 times.
In Reply To	He can't... (n/m) posted by Atti2de on February 26, 2003 at 04:01 PM
Message	but i must have had a moment of weakness GET IN ON THE HID GROUP BUY Sorry, i actually enjoy my car rather then try to prove something with it =) - Jack B. 06/02/02 21:29:42 Just because you have a TT doesnt make you a better person. - John(Houston) 08/26/02 22:58:26 the silent but deadly administrators will take more notice of your attitude ... they don't just block your user id. they will delete your existance from the internet, they are that good - niXit 01/03/03 21:03:10
Follow Ups	Dyno pull #23 on my NA @ 11psi.>>> - Z1 Motorsports 12:40:20 02/26/03 any chance you'll release some pics of the car's set-up? - ZEngineer 12:44:27 02/26/03 gladly. Will put up this weekend on our site (n/m) - Z1 Motorsports 12:48:37 02/26/03 thanks, feels nice to know that my NA engine - ZEngineer 12:52:05 02/26/03 pssst... - Spee 13:27:10 02/26/03 you know what I meant, stop being a dick =) (n/m) - ZEngineer 13:32:26 02/26/03 He can't... (n/m) - Atti2de 16:01:46 02/26/03 ya know .. i was gonna say something about that. - Guapo 16:09:55 02/26/03 Sounds good. ;-) (n/m) - AshsZ (FABio) 13:59:09 02/26/03 Whats the web addy? (n/m) - rave 15:03:29 02/26/03 click - Tennyson (ATL) 15:11:30 02/26/03 that's a very efficient set up. Most TTZ's with 340rwhp - TTony 12:49:20 02/26/03 I wouldn't say it's due to that - Marshall 12:59:47 02/26/03 Re: I wouldn't say it's due to that - Spongerider (Now PFC) 13:34:33 02/26/03 Re: Re: I wouldn't say it's due to that - Marshall 13:40:16 02/26/03 Yup, everything you see in my profile is current and - Spongerider (Now PFC) 13:46:44 02/26/03 I agree, low torque is from low boost, high HP - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 13:51:00 02/26/03 why does a TT running 11psi have much more torque than hp? (n/m) - TTony 20:46:43 02/26/03 Look at this chart, good idea of how boost affects TQ, HP - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 21:48:34 02/26/03 The turbos are inefficient, hence the higher torque numbers. (n/m) - Only1Z 13:21:22 02/26/03 I've been following this news with interest. Sadly, - cherry 13:17:16 02/26/03 OK, what browser is that - just curious ? (n/m) - stumbleshoe 13:23:09 02/26/03 What turbos are running on it? stockers? >> - Greg (Dallas) 15:25:08 02/26/03 Yep. OLD stock 5sp. They aren't the smoothest>> - Z1 Motorsports 15:30:26 02/26/03 Cool. Thanks for the info. (n/m) - Greg (Dallas) 15:34:38 02/26/03 A little water for Det. suppression could be interesting. (n/m) - Flycaz 15:36:23 02/26/03 Great works Z1.. - Carlos Ramirez 18:00:26 02/26/03 I hate to expose you right out in the open because - AshsZ (FABio) 21:11:47 02/26/03 how about over 600RWHP on a NA Supra? - Carlos Ramirez 22:03:33 02/26/03 I was there, it only detonated on 2 runs, - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 10:32:06 02/27/03 thanks. timing is actually retarded between>>> - Z1 Motorsports 07:36:45 02/27/03 Cool project....I like your approach. (n/m) - RSR 19:26:09 02/26/03 Thanks for posting the results Todd. - AshsZ (FABio) 20:25:53 02/26/03 think 26 would be pushing it? (n/m) - HalfnHalf702[HJC] 22:06:09 02/26/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.